Re: Feedback after 10 days playing with 3MINS.....!!! Tell us your opinion!

I tried 2 games against Playaveli with Superteams and 10 mins .. BORING!!
I

SWOS is never boring, 3 minutes, 5 minutes, 7 minutes, 10 minutes.

You like that?

Yes i like all game times.

But i agree for league time to be short, only because a lot of games to play.
Some international standards and professional level comments offcourse i dont agree with.
I agree that it is your league and you can do whatever you want (even put only pass goal counts rule and something like that :=) ) .

Your first point is exactly the reason why ooo and ASL is played with 3mins! It s a professional competition.

The player who makes the fewest mistakes, who has the most deadly attack and the best defense in 3mins is the deserved winner of the best and highest leveled league in the world...the ASL champion.

The reason why ooo is 3mins is pretty much the same. The results have effect on the also professional ranking. The same arguments as above should make a player climb up the ranking. If you look for challange and competition, just take part and prove yourself.

To Playaveli : i would like to understand..., could you please explain me the professional competition concept?

Mine wasn t ironic remark!
blame lost in translation, but considering playaveli is talking about professional competition ... may i know what is that?

We speak different languages, i know...and exactly for that reason i would like to clearly understand what he s talking about, instead of replying or quoting something i didn t understand.


I must ask teutopheus to be 100% sure , but i think his poll is about do you like the 3 mins rule as default?

I think he s aware he can create a custom competition with the rules he wants, i think this is not about that, but once again, maybe i didn t get the sense...

Thanks!

PS: Your other comments aren t necessarily a credit to yourself... Your niveau is too high to talk trash! I have a higher opinion of you in general!

Hmm..
If i got this right, you are telling me my other comments were trash ?

Redhair , reading all post, i really do believe we must blame the lost in translation...

btw when i read this from you:
We want to adapt the online-gaming competitions (we organize) to the offline competitions
i understand now why i can t understand your point, because as an online player i don t see the need to adapt to anything offline.
Probably you see the point where those two worlds, so different for me, but ,apparently, very close for you, meet each other.
Probably ss.de is more an offline movement than i thought it was and that explains why my insisting on the online community as a world itself was often misunderstood ; i always thought ss.de was not related to ISSA or WST (that are pc swos offline not amiga emu online) in any way, but apparently i was wrong there too. Sorry for all the misunderstandings, case closed

My point about professional swos, btw, is more technical and easy to explain:
if i take in consideration the chances i have to beat a player , to name one, coolio and i would put on a scale , i would say : 3mins hard, but possible, 5 mins very hard but still statistically possible , 7mins almost impossible - 10 mins... do i really want to try?
So taking this scale as an example , playing with a swos master, would be easier for me to win with a short amount of time and beating him with 10 mins would be kinda the greatest achievement ever here in ss.de, so i would say , if you ask me, a short amount of time is less professional , because with more time to play my opponents skills (in this example , coolio) would prevail 99/100 if not 100/100 and this is , in my opinion, what is swos is all about, skills.
Obviously taking that scale in consideration, without that scale, it s like i said blah blah blah.
For a strong player (starting from the point he s stronger than you ) , maybe 3 mins could be a great challenge, because he s giving you a chance and he s basically playing against the clock , not only against you. But i would not be happy to find out i am not a challenge for my opponent and that he needs an extra to have some drama.
The more the 2 players have same skills, the more the amount of time is irrilevant, but considering that is quite impossible to have 2 identical skilled players, sure a longer game would give more indications (comparing an identical amount of games played , i.e. 100 3 mins games compared to 100 5 mins games) on who s stronger than who - I hope i don t have to explain you why.
Considering the desynch problem...7 - 10 mins games are not the best choice, too many games would desynch before the 90th...so 5 mins would be the next best thing . of course, if you want to see the more skilled to prevail.

So my point is , for me more professional is where you see the skills prevail (especially on the long run), the more you can gain lucky wins, the less the game is professional, as simple as that...