DIY league within the tournament

More
14 years 1 month ago #25780 by Wänä81
Yes , right that can happen , but it´s my mistake than . When you takle my best attacker , why i must play without him in the next matches ! That is frustrating . Sorry :P

It s harsh, but don t blame injuries when you don t have the skills to achieve a better result, even with injuries. Blame your skills.


As i said : Greetz from the weaker side of life ;)
The topic has been locked.
More
14 years 1 month ago #25781 by Redhair
I think everyone can have some advantages or disadvantages because of injuries, but in my case I played without my best players where I thought I can win anyway. That s something tactical which is in the game . I like that and I don t want to miss that. If you need a special player to win, you are just not good enough.
The topic has been locked.
More
14 years 1 month ago #25786 by Eleven

My view is injuries and suspensions just add up to a tournament drama.
Comparing to a real life soccer - no manager ever has a comfort of playing with full squad, and its when their mastercraft can be seen.
At Sensi Days I played maybe 3-4 games with a full squad it was really anoying but still I wouldnt change the rules. Actually I wished yellow cards from the games would be recorded and suspensions implied (just like Champions League for example).
And I am really glad that many people have different views which makes every tournament unique.

May be for online tournaments. But for offline, some players coming from far away, and why shouldn t they play with their complete squads every match?
And we can not compare it with real football. Because we can t say : Oh my Suker did not play very well today or Suker wasn t good enough so I took him off from the pitch and my young subtitute player has done very vell ... I mean you can t increase performances of your players like real managers do.

I know i didn t play well on group stage and did not reserved to qualify. But, it may be a big step for an average player as me to get into quarterfinals, if i could have played with my full forwards.
The topic has been locked.
More
14 years 1 month ago #25788 by Wänä81

I think everyone can have some advantages or disadvantages because of injuries, but in my case I played without my best players where I thought I can win anyway. That s something tactical which is in the game . I like that and I don t want to miss that. If you need a special player to win, you are just not good enough.


1. I don´t want an advantage, i want a fair competition

2. If you can win with injured players , you are a SWOS-GOD ( so why you don´t win the cup ....?)

3. It´s pity, you said i am not good enough! I must draw my conclusion from the answer that i´m not worth to play against SWOS-LEGENDS

Result for me = If you can t make it you re a worthless piece of swos junk :(



The topic has been locked.
More
14 years 1 month ago #25791 by NAKKEOST
i dont think its only the tactical thing which my thought about this subject is positve

there is some other:

U have to adjust your playingstyle as well...

within friendly matches.. u can go as crazy as u like.. just run in to the man.. dribble around him.. dribble again.. shoot - GOAALLL (in real: would you run into materazzi?)

but if u do this in diy league this will break some legs.. u have to shoot or pass earlier - on this way u give have the smallest chance on injuries

NOTE: THIS DOESNT SAY U WILL HAVE LESS INJURIES THEN SOMEBODY WHO PLAYS LIKE A MANIAC.. but overal.. if u compare 20 players playing less forced then 20 maniacs.. the difference will be there

+

the tactical stuff about substition before the game.. during the game...

+

ITS THE GAME... IT SHOULD BE LIKE THAT

+

There is no way to manipulate the gameplan.. if u have to play u just have to play... u cant say: im tired now im going to sleep for 10 matches (hehehehhehehehe)

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

On the other hand:

Luck and unluck will always remain a factor.. no matter how u try it... u can have influence on it.. but it will stay
The topic has been locked.
More
14 years 1 month ago - 14 years 1 month ago #25797 by Playaveli

1. I don´t want an advantage, i want a fair competition

2. If you can win with injured players , you are a SWOS-GOD ( so why you don´t win the cup ....?)

3. It´s pity, you said i am not good enough! I must draw my conclusion from the answer that i´m not worth to play against SWOS-LEGENDS


1. Then you should really consider to use superteams.

2. Redhair wasn t kick out in the group phase (which we are talking about here).

3. *sigh*...

ITS THE GAME... IT SHOULD BE LIKE THAT


Good point and valuable for our tournament. We want to play SWOS 96/97....not only because of the nice gameplay. We want to include everything what is possible in this game into our tournament. Free team choice, tactic editor and tournament editor (-- DIY). No limits to anything...

Enough from me in this topic. It s all been said. We re turning round in circles.

The opinions are equalled circa. In this topic are 7-8 pro DIY, and 5-6 against. It would continue like this.
The topic has been locked.
More
14 years 1 month ago - 14 years 1 month ago #25802 by Redhair

1. I don´t want an advantage, i want a fair competition

2. If you can win with injured players , you are a SWOS-GOD ( so why you don´t win the cup ....?)

3. It´s pity, you said i am not good enough! I must draw my conclusion from the answer that i´m not worth to play against SWOS-LEGENDS

Result for me = If you can t make it you re a worthless piece of swos junk :(


Sorry, but what the hell are you writing here? I did never write or mean something related to that you ve posted here. It just sounds you are crying in pillow. In my opinion it was a fair competition. I was just talking about tactical things and that players need more creativity than one move with a special player to reach the next round. That s all, nothing to do with worth or something like that, it sounds like the childish way to find excuses. You should learn to lose.
The topic has been locked.
More
14 years 1 month ago #25804 by NAKKEOST
alright
maybe it wasnt such a good idea to open this topic

i was just curious if anybody changed his mind on this subject... but there is clearly 2 camps: pro - anti anti - pro

can this topic be closed pls :)
The topic has been locked.
More
14 years 1 month ago #25805 by Wänä81
I don´t need any excuses . I can lose -- ask Pallister . Learn to accept critical words ;)
The topic has been locked.
More
14 years 1 month ago #25806 by NAKKEOST
CLOSE
LOSE
OSE
SE
E
E
SE
ASE
EASE
LEASE
PLEASE
The topic has been locked.
Time to create page: 0.178 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum