Re: Anarchy in #SWOS?

More
13 years 8 months ago #34311 by Infiltrate
Replied by Infiltrate on topic Re: Anarchy in #SWOS?
hi all, im sry for what i did, especially to playa and foka, it was in the heat of the moment i know thats no excuse though.
The topic has been locked.
13 years 8 months ago #34313 by ElMichaJ
Replied by ElMichaJ on topic Re: Anarchy in #SWOS?
just a little example for my own person....


since 2001 i worked nearly 2000 hours on this project (less or more)


if i took 10 € per hour, it would be 20.000 €

that is only my present to this community....

dont know what the others had to pay on work and time...



so please to all difficult people

just realize THIS

and think about the things you will do or not


Hey Hey Hey .... El Micha J !!!
The topic has been locked.
More
13 years 8 months ago #34331 by Stromberg
Replied by Stromberg on topic Re: Anarchy in #SWOS?
realize this: don t care

The channel is now a swos-mates chan and some ppl aren t welcome. It s not in any way related to ss.de anymore. It should be none of your business.

P.S. I do care for you of course in the sense that you put a lot of work into it and it would be a great personally loss for you. That would really be a pity. Though I do not care about ss.de or its future at all. Close it, run it, make it the best site in the interent and/or put it full of porn: don t care. Repeat: #SWOS has nothing to do (anymore) with ss.de
The topic has been locked.
More
13 years 8 months ago #34345 by Redhair
Replied by Redhair on topic Re: Anarchy in #SWOS?

realize this: don t care

The channel is now a swos-mates chan and some ppl aren t welcome. It s not in any way related to ss.de anymore. It should be none of your business.

P.S. I do care for you of course in the sense that you put a lot of work into it and it would be a great personally loss for you. That would really be a pity. Though I do not care about ss.de or its future at all. Close it, run it, make it the best site in the interent and/or put it full of porn: don t care. Repeat: #SWOS has nothing to do (anymore) with ss.de

Once again, I am really disappointed as I wonder why you write such words about ss.de (and so against me as well). Whatever your problem is, I don t think that things calm down in this way and you are doing not better than any unwelcome people , quite the opposite! You spit on the project and that hurts me. I am disappointed with your nature, this has nothing to do with SWOS anymore. You take me for a ride, but for what? But I realized that it s better for me to avoid Stromberg s kindergarten to spare my nerves.
The topic has been locked.
More
13 years 8 months ago #34354 by Stromberg
Replied by Stromberg on topic Re: Anarchy in #SWOS?
Let me just get this:

I say I don t care about you , you say Why do you hate us ??? In fact I said the opposite by wishing you personally all the best. Just to clear it up, again and hopefully for the last time:

Anyway, if someone is banned on ss.de resp. #sensible, he is able to join #SWOS where he is operator.

None of your business. #SWOS is not related to #sensible or ss.de . You may ask why are the admins still banned then , I say: historical reasons and will fade away :P

but maybe there must be some rebellion channel

Please open a new one. #SWOS isn t (anymore)

as you could see, there were some differences cause of ranking in former times...

I ll leave that party uncommented, but it just shows sweetly that you still didn t get anything.

all separate playing sensible players have the possibility to write an email with wishes and ideas and we will se what we can do for it

A nice thing and I would really appreciate it. That is if I would still care about the site. Which I don t. Obviously. Hopefully obviously.

the main function of #SWOS is to moan about ss.de and their admins

It isn t. You are not important. In fact we don t care about you.

dislike the idea to use the name of the game as a parallel IRC channel to spoil the solidarity within a community

It doesn t. It hasn t got anything to with ss.de. I hope I m not repeating myself too much here.

Such things destroy my motivation and not only mine. We earn no money, quite the reverse, but on one of these days you ask yourself why? I could without that

Do whatever you like. As I said in my previous post to Micha: Make ss.de the best (swos) internet site in the world or make it a gold-membership poker site. Whatever you do, I hope you re happy. But really: I don t care.

But if someone prefers to talk behind my back, without to eliminate prejudices: to hell with you!

I hope you finally got it, else: to hell with you!

---
This will probably be my last post ever in the hope that you understood what I m saying. I wish you seriously all the best.
The topic has been locked.
13 years 8 months ago #34363 by ElMichaJ
Replied by ElMichaJ on topic Re: Anarchy in #SWOS?
stromberg is out

now i really dont care about him

Hey Hey Hey .... El Micha J !!!
The topic has been locked.
More
13 years 8 months ago #34366 by Coolio_Jack
Replied by Coolio_Jack on topic Re: Anarchy in #SWOS?
I think noone actually tried to understand what the man is saying. I didnt see any offences.
The topic has been locked.
More
13 years 8 months ago - 13 years 8 months ago #34410 by Redhair
Replied by Redhair on topic Re: Anarchy in #SWOS?
The man is saying nothing but words like make it full of porn, I don t care which are offences (and) together with I wish seriously you all the best in this context it is just paradox. Also the whole I repeat procedure in his last post let me think he wants to take me for an idiot and if I still don t understand I should go to hell . And I still don t understand the reason to ply with me and ss.de in that way. If you think it s no insulting, it s your opinion but not mine. I cannot tell you how I am disappointed of Stromberg. He should really know himself that he was one of the most distinguished members of ss.de, this no smarm. Not without reason his name is in our team in the XBLA SWOS data. I cannot remember that I have done anything to him, banning me for historical reasons is a slap in my face. That may sound like crying, but it s just disappointment and I am pretty sure that it was not his own idea to ban me. But what is it worth for me if he do so, of course my life will go on and I really don t need to join his channel, but I will still not accept if someone tries to damage the whole project because of some personal differences.
The topic has been locked.
More
13 years 8 months ago #34437 by Pallister
Replied by Pallister on topic Re: Anarchy in #SWOS?
It was definitely his own idea. Be sure about it.
The topic has been locked.
More
13 years 8 months ago #34465 by Redhair
Replied by Redhair on topic Re: Anarchy in #SWOS?

It was definitely his own idea. Be sure about it.

I really doubt it. Because it was the 2nd time he banned me, first time was because of a post in Codemasters forum and after a talk with him he unbanned me and I thought it s cleared so far. Since them we had not any contact and I did nothing, the new ban came out of nowhere, so it cannot be his own idea. Wouldn t you feel taken for a ride? Those historical reasons must be inoculated from someone or they had a poll about me. I really don t know, I never had a problem with Stromberg before, so I hope you understand what I mean.
The topic has been locked.
Time to create page: 0.208 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum