Tactic rules
For a tournament type like Sensi Days, It makes the most sense for me if tactics was allowed in every game, like back in 2007. The World Cup should be the place where you see the BEST players, playing their BEST both gameplay wise and tactical wise. Otherwise it is like playing with a handicap.
Exactly!
Then you could say we should play sensi days with Superteams
E.g. when I play Ali I need to play long diagonal passes to link up with Silva. Playing with superteams would eliminate Bebetos running-battle against Silva. It is a part of the game to exploit the weaknesses in tactics and setup of teams.
Im not saying a vote for changes but I think it is a good idea to discuss different options.
E.g. when I play Ali I need to play long diagonal passes to link up with Silva. Playing with superteams would eliminate Bebetos running-battle against Silva. It is a part of the game to exploit the weaknesses in tactics and setup of teams.
But going for the exploit solution everytime will give you a very one-sided match, and thus be more boring to play imo.
E.g. when I play Ali I need to play long diagonal passes to link up with Silva. Playing with superteams would eliminate Bebetos running-battle against Silva. It is a part of the game to exploit the weaknesses in tactics and setup of teams.
But going for the exploit solution everytime will give you a very one-sided match, and thus be boring to play.
Yeah I totally agree, but some would say it is a part of the game. Ofc Ali could move Silva if he wanted to eliminate those passes.
standard vs standard
tactic vs standard
or tactic vs tactic
there was lots of games where people on amiga played 2 games with tactics, and there wasnt any problem
so everybody wins,
if you are so good with your tactic and what on standard you gonna start loosing ? its still the same game, empty places are in every standard tac s, you are able or you arent to exploit them
i dont understand because in fact its nothing changes for most tactic players, or you are soo chicken, its all about only one game and so many comments ...
even after this 50/50 change there is still advantage for tactics players isnt ? so why make it double ?
so please tell me where is biggest advantage ?
The biggest advantage would be not to disallow anything!
Everybody can edit their own custom tactic or use an existing one on disc (if someone refuses it s his own decision or problem).
Where is a disadvantage in freedom?
- AndYpsilon
-
- Offline
- Administrator
-
- Posts: 1523
- Thank you received: 1
even after this 50/50 change there is still advantage for tactics players isnt ? so why make it double ?
But you are allowed to play with custom tactic as well. Nobody prevents you from doing that.
If you don t want to do that that s not the problem of the players who do want to play with tactic - no offense

- Coolio_Jack
-
- Offline
- Elite Member
-
- Posts: 540
- Thank you received: 0
).
Imo the standard tactics have soo many flaws and exploits you can abuse time and time again, if you know this well. IE the high diagonal crossing vs 541/523 (
Come on, its not nearly as simple as it looks in that video

About playing with other people s tactics, that somehow just doesnt feel right for me.
Swos Spirit? Come on..
If you call us chickens who are afraid to loose, i could call you a lazy guy, who does not want to invest time into creating a tactic.
But this obviosly is populistic bullshit and does not help us.
Keep it to the facts!
so tackling opponents players to death is an option, like tactics, high headers, curled passes or disgusting goals

playing without tactics is the same restriction (i.m.o) like playing without tackling, headers or passes. (i like to play without tactics by the way)
the tactic rule was a compromise, not more, not less.
on the highest level (WorldCup,ASL) there must be all features on.
on smaller events its up to the organizer which rules are given, the players vote about it by coming or not coming
by the way

i have kicked out playa with his own tactic


Hey Hey Hey .... El Micha J !!!